Materials Similar to Analyzing the dimensionality of the Energy and Momentum Conceptual Survey using Item Response Theory

home » Detail Page » Similar Materials

Materials Similar to Analyzing the dimensionality of the Energy and Momentum Conceptual Survey using Item Response Theory

62%: Analyzing Multiple-Choice-Multiple-Response Items Using Item Response Theory
58%: Motivations for using the item response theory nominal response model to rank responses to multiple-choice items
53%: Multidimensional Item Response Theory and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
51%: Linking and comparing short and full-length concept inventories of electricity and magnetism using item response theory
51%: Item response theory analysis of the mechanics baseline test
51%: Quantitatively ranking incorrect responses to multiple-choice questions using item response theory
49%: Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism: Analysis of the items and recommendations for improvement
48%: Multidimensional item response theory and the force and motion conceptual evaluation
48%: Replicating analyses of item response curves using data from the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
46%: Classical test theory and item response theory comparison of the brief electricity and magnetism assessment and the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
45%: Multidimensional item response theory and the Force Concept Inventory
45%: Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
45%: Identifying a preinstruction to postinstruction factor model for the Force Concept Inventory within a multitrait item response theory framework
45%: Multidimensional item response theory and the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment
42%: Methods for utilizing Item response theory with Coupled, Multiple-Response assessments
42%: Exploring the CLASS with Item Response Theory
41%: Energy and Momentum Conceptual Survey
41%: Using the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism to investigate progression in student understanding from introductory to advanced levels
40%: Comparing pre/post item response curves to identify changes in misconceptions